What adds to the trust factor is that Telegram isn’t owned and operated by a company like Facebook, which has a reputation of being shady and of questionable morality. At no point in the past has the company been proven to be snooping on its users' data, and it clearly states that it doesn’t intend to, either. To be fair, Telegram and its makers have time and again proven their mettle by being vocal about user privacy, protecting user identities during Hong Kong’s mega protests, and even resisting the FBI when it apparently wanted a backdoor into Telegram. It often boasts about one instance from 2016 when it was subpoenaed to release any information it had on a particular number, and all it could hand over was the date of account creation and the last login - that’s it. The app doesn’t log your IP address, and whatever little metadata it collects is also encrypted. Having said that, Signal doesn’t collect nearly as much data on you as WhatsApp does. WhatsApp is known for its widespread popularity and features like end-to-end encryption, Telegram offers a combination of security features and extensive customization options, while Signal is highly regarded for its strong focus on privacy and encryption. With over two billion users, it easily outpaces Telegram and Signal. WhatsApp, Telegram, and Signal are all messaging platforms, but they differ in terms of their features and focus on privacy and security. What adds to the trust factor is that Telegram isn’t owned and operated by a company like Facebook. When it comes to popularity, WhatsApp is the king. Still, the service has its limits, like the need to sign up with a phone number (rather than something like a username or an email address). Another thing that helps is the fact that Signal is run by a nonprofit that survives on donations from users and other benefactors, rather than by monetizing your data. As a matter of fact, Signal developed the encryption protocol that WhatsApp uses. Signal's claim to fame is its privacy-first approach, which includes open-sourcing its code and enabling E2EE by default. Issues like these have led several privacy proponents, including noted ones like Edward Snowden (and more recently Elon Musk), to suggest using Signal instead. While generating revenue is absolutely necessary to sustain a platform that hosts hundreds of millions of users, these new plans open the door to the possibility that ads may spread to other sections of the app over time. Although Telegram made it abundantly clear that the ads will be both user-friendly and respectful of your privacy, it’s getting increasingly hard to trust such promises after witnessing several companies backtrack on their word. Signal is run by a nonprofit that survives on donations from users and other benefactors, rather than by monetizing your data.Īnother point of apprehension is that Telegram recently announced its revenue model, which involves serving ads to large channels.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |